Friday, February 11, 2011

Safari Part 2: Views From Kruger



In December, my family and I went to Kruger. I took so many photos that I decided to split them up over several posts. The following photos are of some of the spectacular views (side note: great song) we saw while driving around the park. You can see Part 1 here.






















Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Safari Part 1: Kruger's Big Five


In December, my family and I went to the Kruger National Park in North-Eastern South Africa. Unsurprisingly, I took over a thousand photos, and it's taken me a long time to sort through them. I've split the photos up into a few posts. Today, I'm offering up the Big Five--elephant, leopard, Cape buffalo, rhino, and lion--so named because they are the five most dangerous animals one can hunt in Africa. We had incredible luck in Kruger and saw all Big Five within the first two trips into the park (we had four days on safari drives and one day to see nearby sights).






This guy got close enough to petrify my sister, who spent some time studying desert elephants in Namibia (my dad and I, not really knowing any better, were too busy with mouths agape to take in the head shaking and ear flapping, among other warning signs).






Unfortunately, the leopard didn't do much--it was blazing hot--but I'm not complaining. I'm still shocked we saw one at all.




The Cape buffalo were hard to photograph--they liked the brushy, scrubby areas, and Kruger in winter is at its peak greenery. Cape buffalo are considered, along with hippos, to be among the most dangerous animals in Africa.






Shortly after I took this photo, the buffalo herd started running. Our guide guessed that a lion had intentionally scared them into running in one direction--towards the pride that awaited on the other side. Careening off past the frightened buffalo, we saw...




The lions sat and listened (and played) for a bit and then, one by one, headed down into a wash and off to hunt.






With this last two, we sat in a dry creekbed for a long while. The male was hidden back in the brush, and we could hear the lionesses eating something--there was the unmistakable sound of cracking bones.





The first incredible thing we saw on our game drives was this herd (?) of rhinos. We were driving along, minding our own business, when they just sort of appeared on the side of the road. As I felt shark diving, I kept wanting to reach out and pet the rhinos, especially the baby. This was the kind of commentary on the drives (in open 4x4 safari trucks) that made my family a little nervous.



Their hides were amazing--and covered in flies. Sometimes I secretly think that rhinos are actually dinosaurs.



Yeah, we were pretty close.




Monday, February 7, 2011

Pieces on the Middle East (and North Africa)

Thought I'd take a moment to showcase my friend Jack's post on the ONE blog. It's about links between food (in)security and the political unrest across the Middle East-North Africa region.

Also, an article in Foreign Policy about humor and politics--which is apparently an Egyptian pastime since the pharaohs and has taken a particularly interesting turn under Mubarak's 30-year rule. I love the bit about the Romans outlawing all Egyptian advocates because they cracked too many jokes. Killjoys, those Romans.


Knowing very little about the background to all of this, I hesitate to write more about what's going on. I'm just following the news as best as I can.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

USAID to the Chopping Block?

So, 165 Republicans/conservatives (I don't know what to call these people anymore) in the House have decided that in order to save some dollars, we should just go ahead and defund USAID (disclosure: the org for which I work receives over 2/3rds of its funding from the US Government).

I've been struggling to write about this, but luckily, Allie already wrote a great post about it over on her blog. So fortuitous.

She argues that, apart from its moral implications, foreign aid has always been part and parcel of American defense and diplomacy. The two biggest recipients of USAID right now are Afghanistan and Pakistan. USAID was created and expanded to stop the spread of Communism:

In fact, this ideological foundation was so significant to USAID that the program crumbled along with the Berlin Wall and the fall of communism. Without the obvious connection between security objectives and social and economic development, both Congress and the Presidency turned their backs on USAID. From 1985 to 1997, foreign aid appropriations consistently decreased, and USAID cut thirty percent of its positions from 1993 to 1996.


Of course, foreign assistance should go beyond military, defense, or diplomatic goals. I believe it is the US's responsibility as a wealthier, more stable nation to help out those countries that are struggling. We cannot exist in a vacuum. But there are other incentives, too. As Allie writes:

...In the age of globalization, we are a world of global problems. We cannot pretend that the issues our country faces stop at our borders. What happens in Haiti, what happens in South Africa… these things reverberate within the United States. HIV does not recognize national sovereignty, nor does climate change. And though we’re so worked up about immigration policies, we do not often stop to think about how we could lessen migrant flows by improving quality of life within other countries. Global development is in our best interests in every sense, from the political to the social and even extending to the economic, where emerging markets offer significant opportunities for U.S. business to expand.

So, I think Allie has laid it all out quite nicely. USAID: Good for defense, good for diplomacy, good for the economy. Also, good for health, human rights, democracy, women's rights, children, the environment, and a whole other mess of things.


Many, many, many thanks to Allie for letting me steal from her better-researched, better-written, more-thought-out post. Just go read her instead. She has nice photos too.



Monday, January 17, 2011

While I'm At It...

...Chinua Achebe wrote an incredible piece in the NYT on Sunday about Nigeria. It brings up all those uncomfortable questions I ask myself regularly about (apologies, generalizations) Africa, colonial and post-colonial. Of course (I'm not sure why "of course" but it doesn't surprise me, at least), Achebe is both much more hopeful and much more cynical--and, as he writes, loves a provocateur's stance. And a well-turned phrase.


Remembering Lumumba

Today marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the democratically-elected prime minister of the Republic of the Congo (formerly; also formerly Zaire and now the DRC). Adam Hochschild, who wrote King Leopold's Ghost, has a nice little opinion piece over at the Times. Lumumba's assassination, for me, is one of the saddest moments in African post-colonial history, the doorway that opened to the chaos, violence, and oppression that has ensued in the Congolese region in the last fifty years. In fact, Lumumba was one of the only rays of hope in over a century of atrocities by Belgians and then by local leaders, Mobutu Sese Seko/Joseph Mobutu foremost among them. I also think it's important to acknowledge the involvement of the United States (and Belgium, of course) in the assassination of Lumumba and destabilization of the Congo. Anyway, take a gander.